Satellite tugs

From http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/090218-dawn-asteroid-mars.html
But there is a downside to Dawn's swing past Mars. Just as the probe nabbed a speed boost from the planet, the encounter slowed Mars by a tiny fraction, mission managers said.  "The flyby will cause Mars to slow in its orbit enough that after one year, its position will be off by about the width of an atom. If you add that up, it will take about 180 million years for Mars to be out of position by one inch (2.5 cm)," Rayman said. "We appreciate Mars making that sacrifice so Dawn can conduct its exciting mission of discovery in the asteroid belt."

If one measley probe can tug at Mars, what about all those satellites around earth??  If earth's orbit shifts, the tides man, oh, the tides...

Words of the wise

Life isn't about finding yourself.
Life is about creating yourself.

Quotes unknown.

Finding code definitions in VS.NET IDE

How do I find the code its Interfaces copies?  I’m looking at a method however it also has an Interface.  I must use the Find dialog to search the entire solution? 

Go To Definition (F12), then it takes me to an interface. Is there a better way to find the functioning class rather than the Interface class?  I know tools like Resharper, etc makes it easier…

Wild idea to help the economy.

Let's take a company as an example: Bank of America.  They just went on an acquisition binge buying troubled outfits Countrywide Financial and Merrill Lynch.  BoA has been hoodwinked unfortunately cumulating with Thain’s decoration bill.  Anyway, as a result, Bank of America is announcing layoffs.

If the layoffs were from consolidating operations then there you go.  They're contributing to the rising unemployment rates, and while everyone was doing fine (ML, I think would have came out of their crisis ok, and Countrywide would have proportionally have less layoffs.)  Without those mergers, we would kept work “duplicated” however STILL EFFICIENT since whatever work they do is still for the betterment of their respective corporations.  Most respectable companies reduce staff out of attrition rather than outright laying them off.

Now, being taught economics, one thing always leads to another: corporation buys their weaker counterparts, lays people off due to duplication, then those unemployed would be collecting unemployment, further sapping companies out of money, then eventually those unemployed won't be able to buy shares, either outright or through their retirement plans, of any company simply because they cannot afford to. Corporation stock prices drops, lays more people off. Domino effect.

Remember when W. asked us to do the "patriotic thing" by spending money!  Well, shouldn't corporations start spending money to keep employees retained?

What goes around comes around...